11 reasons why you should review your code of ethics

  • 27 April 2018

A code of ethics is an important document. Yet that in itself can be a downside. Often launched with a fanfare, they can then lie unchanged for years. Codes then acquire a rather fossilised existence, slowly but surely losing their influence on how people go about their work.

This path to irrelevance needs to be addressed. If your code of ethics isn’t contributing something to your business, then you need to change it to make sure that it does.

Here are 11 reasons why your firm needs to take a fresh look at its code of ethics.

It's last review

It’s been a long time since anyone has. If your firm hasn’t reviewed its code of ethics in the last five years, then it’s safe to say it’s already starting to become fossilised.

Getting attention

No one pays attention to it anymore. Look at how many page views it has been getting on your intranet? What do those numbers, and their trend, tell you? Compare it with page views for say, reporting concerns or for disciplinary issues.

A different firm

Your firm has changed. If there’s been mergers, divestments,  or even new business models, then this will have introduced new ethical risks. These will need to be reflected in your code of ethics, for if your code isn’t in sync with your business, it’s irrelevant.

Its language

Your people don’t understand it. Sometimes code of ethics can be written in complex language, which floats right over the head of most employees. Your code should be in plain English. 

Over aspirational

Your people find it too vague. Codes of ethics can sometimes be written in aspirational terms that people find difficult to connect with the everyday reality of their work. It’s always good for a code of ethics to have some aspiration in it, but too much can be counter-productive.

Too Detailed

Your people find it too detailed. Sometimes codes of ethics can feel more like rulebooks, with list after list of instructions. There certainly needs to be some direction in a code of ethics, but again, too much can be counter-productive.

Make it relevant

You’ve asked employees about the code of ethics and found that few remember anything about it or pay it attention. Your code has to speak to the people it is addressing and offer them something of value, that they can do something with. If your code doesn’t have something to say about the  ethical risks people are encountering, then they will not pay it any attention. Even worse, they may downplay those ethical risks because the code is silent on them. 

New leaders

There are new people at the top of your firm. A key influence on the ethical culture of your firm will be the ‘tone from the top’ provided by its senior people. If the leadership on ethics being provided by an incoming chief executive isn’t in sync with the firm’s code of ethics, then that needs to be addressed in some way.

Reflecting misconduct

There have been some serious misconduct issues. It is after such incidents that the firm has to be confident that its code is up to scratch. Any review of how to avoid a repeat of such misconduct should look at the code of ethics as well.

The firm as well

Your code of ethics speaks too much to the individual and doesn’t recognise the role of that the firm plays. Such codes may in fact prove to be a compliance hurdle, for regulators may view one sided codes as indicative of an imbalanced ethical culture.

Digital risks

Insurance is changing, particularly through data. Codes nowadays must address the ethics of data in order to remain relevant. And the issues involved can be quite unique, so it’s important not to assume that yesterday’s code will work in tomorrow’s market.

I’ve seen some great codes of ethics in my time, and to be honest, some not so great ones. And such ‘weighing up’ needs to take account of both the context within which the code exists, and the purpose for which it is being used. These are not static, and neither should be your code of ethics.

Time to hit the ‘refresh’ button?

About the Author Duncan Minty

Duncan is the founder of the Ethics and Insurance blog and the author of its many posts. He's a Chartered Insurance Practitioner, having worked 18 years in the UK market. As an adviser to many firms on ethics issues, as well as a regular conference speaker, he is one of the leading voices on ethics and insurance.

follow me on: